For dinner yesterday, I wanted to have a burrito and a salad. So I placed a tortilla in the toaster oven, and headed out to the garden to pick salad ingredients. There were a few cherry tomatoes, a big tomato ready to come in before the squirrels ate it, some basil, and just a bit of mint. And a banana pepper.
I describe all of this to indicate the approximate duration of my stay in the back yard. I entered the house and instantly smelled "burning something" and could see a bit of a haze ahead.
I rush into the kitchen, and behold, I saw flames behind a cloudy toaster oven door. I yelled "CHRIS!" but I quickly remembered she was outside mowing, and not likely to hear me. I grabbed baking soda from the pantry, swung open the oven door, and saw a circle of fire. I threw copious amounts of the baking soda into the oven until I didn't see flames. And then I threw on a bit more.
The house still smells, and I need a bit more time with the oven to remove the scorch stains. But I have to say that I'm impressed with the ability of the oven to hold the fire.
I don't know if I need to test the oven before plugging it back in and using it. I fear I could have baked a circuit board or some critical timer. But it seems to me that the toaster oven engineers should have foreseen "burning mass of food" and computed a few heat transfer equations. I didn't retain enough info from that class to replicate their efforts, so I'm guessing that I'll just use the oven and hope for the best. Or I'll let one of my roommates try first...
26 August 2006
18 August 2006
So I have a job...
It's a part time temp job, but it's a return to the working world none the less!!!
I'll be at the MBA Office, wearing a suit or at least a jacket M-F, noon until 4 PM.
I start Tuesday.
I'll be at the MBA Office, wearing a suit or at least a jacket M-F, noon until 4 PM.
I start Tuesday.
The point...
So this article from the NY Times is its "most blogged." And I can see why. It's about men, aged 30-55, who lost their jobs, but don't go out an get another. The graphic on the left is the most striking. It shows percentage of men from 30-54 who are not working, and shows how this figure changes from 1950 through 2004. The reason most men in the article site for not getting another job is that they don't want to "downgrade" themselves. They won't be able to find another job that pays as well as the one they had before. They want to enjoy their life and live off of their savings.
Before I start, in the interest of self-disclosure, I once did an internship at the steel mill featured in the article, Northwestern Steel and Wire. Second, my dad is retired, and seems to love it. Third, I can just as easily be accused of the last statement of the prior paragraph. (I will, however, go back to work. Soon, I hope.) End of journalistic integrity check.
I could turn this into a "lazy men" bashing post. But, it's actually not my point. This is a symptom of a larger issue that hasn't upset enough people.
I'll touch on education, earnings and jobs:
There are many articles published arguing that boys are falling behind in academic achievement. Valedictorians, student council presidents, and college graduates are all being dominated by women. This prompts some to worry that men are falling behind in this arena. Others say that it is finally the women catching up to what men have always been doing, and it's sexist to be worried about men. All of this misses the big debate.
These articles rarely discuss the fact that there are still careers that women avoid. Men still dominate those majors that usually see the highest earnings right out of college: engineering or the hard sciences. For one reason or another, there is some barrier to entry for women. Exactly what that barrier is, no one yet knows and is the topic of another debate.
Indeed, the Women's Bureau at the US Department of Labor presents some interesting statistics. In their "Hot Jobs for the 21st Century," they provide a list of the fastest growing occupations, as well as the occupations that will provide the largest growth in jobs. Most of the occupations listed on the "fastest" list require at least a college degree, if not postgraduate work. They are computer jobs, health care jobs, and, to my joy, environment related jobs. The "greatest growth" occupations don't usually require a four year degree. The third table on the web page is of note - listing the average weekly salary for given jobs. It makes clear that "more education" brings more money home.
Compare this to the list of 20 Leading Occupations of Employed Women. The jobs women dominate may be on the "greatest growth" list above, but they tend to be those with lower average weekly salaries.
But, money isn't everything, and the pay still isn't the point I want to make.
Some of these jobs, like a nurse, do pay well, the other issue is that all of the"leading occupations" allow you and only you to thrive. These aren't occupations that create jobs for others. We have teacher's aides and nurse's aides so that we need fewer teachers and nurses (this is outsourcing a job too), but not because the teacher or nurse created a new job that needed to be filled. Contrast this to an engineer or scientist, whose job it is to make something new. That new thing must somehow be made, providing jobs to others.
I see the "slacker men" and the lack of women in science and engineering as part of the same problem. The men don't want to retool and acquire skills that will get them back into the economy. Most women are choosing careers that aren't creating jobs for others. We are checking out of the future.
In the future, everything will be sourced to the person who is best suited to complete the task. If you want to thrive, you must be the person it gets sourced to. So you need to create new tasks - innovate - so that you have new things to do. If you innovate it, at least initially, you will be best suited for the work. And that's the thing about a new job - it didn't displace anyone else from his job. And if you are successful, you will create a job for others too. They can thrive too.
If we are going to thrive and not just survive, we need everybody. This is something that I really saw on my trip. About 1% of Indians are involved in IT or manufacturing. The Chinese government censors my blog and google. So it struck me: What's going to happen to the US when these countries get everyone on board?
We need all hands on deck to deal with the changes that are coming. Commit to learning new skills for the rest of your life to stay in the game.
Before I start, in the interest of self-disclosure, I once did an internship at the steel mill featured in the article, Northwestern Steel and Wire. Second, my dad is retired, and seems to love it. Third, I can just as easily be accused of the last statement of the prior paragraph. (I will, however, go back to work. Soon, I hope.) End of journalistic integrity check.
I could turn this into a "lazy men" bashing post. But, it's actually not my point. This is a symptom of a larger issue that hasn't upset enough people.
I'll touch on education, earnings and jobs:
There are many articles published arguing that boys are falling behind in academic achievement. Valedictorians, student council presidents, and college graduates are all being dominated by women. This prompts some to worry that men are falling behind in this arena. Others say that it is finally the women catching up to what men have always been doing, and it's sexist to be worried about men. All of this misses the big debate.
These articles rarely discuss the fact that there are still careers that women avoid. Men still dominate those majors that usually see the highest earnings right out of college: engineering or the hard sciences. For one reason or another, there is some barrier to entry for women. Exactly what that barrier is, no one yet knows and is the topic of another debate.
Indeed, the Women's Bureau at the US Department of Labor presents some interesting statistics. In their "Hot Jobs for the 21st Century," they provide a list of the fastest growing occupations, as well as the occupations that will provide the largest growth in jobs. Most of the occupations listed on the "fastest" list require at least a college degree, if not postgraduate work. They are computer jobs, health care jobs, and, to my joy, environment related jobs. The "greatest growth" occupations don't usually require a four year degree. The third table on the web page is of note - listing the average weekly salary for given jobs. It makes clear that "more education" brings more money home.
Compare this to the list of 20 Leading Occupations of Employed Women. The jobs women dominate may be on the "greatest growth" list above, but they tend to be those with lower average weekly salaries.
But, money isn't everything, and the pay still isn't the point I want to make.
Some of these jobs, like a nurse, do pay well, the other issue is that all of the"leading occupations" allow you and only you to thrive. These aren't occupations that create jobs for others. We have teacher's aides and nurse's aides so that we need fewer teachers and nurses (this is outsourcing a job too), but not because the teacher or nurse created a new job that needed to be filled. Contrast this to an engineer or scientist, whose job it is to make something new. That new thing must somehow be made, providing jobs to others.
I see the "slacker men" and the lack of women in science and engineering as part of the same problem. The men don't want to retool and acquire skills that will get them back into the economy. Most women are choosing careers that aren't creating jobs for others. We are checking out of the future.
In the future, everything will be sourced to the person who is best suited to complete the task. If you want to thrive, you must be the person it gets sourced to. So you need to create new tasks - innovate - so that you have new things to do. If you innovate it, at least initially, you will be best suited for the work. And that's the thing about a new job - it didn't displace anyone else from his job. And if you are successful, you will create a job for others too. They can thrive too.
If we are going to thrive and not just survive, we need everybody. This is something that I really saw on my trip. About 1% of Indians are involved in IT or manufacturing. The Chinese government censors my blog and google. So it struck me: What's going to happen to the US when these countries get everyone on board?
We need all hands on deck to deal with the changes that are coming. Commit to learning new skills for the rest of your life to stay in the game.
08 August 2006
Other photos - Nessie hat and more.
Here's a link to the photos Brooke took when welcoming me back to the States...
The mall...
My watch battery died last week, and I headed to the mall to get it fixed. On my way to the watch kiosk, I had a salesman tout me about his products. I evaded well. Been there, done that.
I hand over my watch, and have a five minute wait. I start to look around, watching the mall-goers as they too are touted. He didn't seem to have much luck.
Behind me, I noticed a new kiosk, as yet, unmanned. They will offer threading, a process common in India and at least some parts of the Middle East. It's hard to succinctly describe, but, it's facial hair removal through use of thread. The thread is twisted, and captures the hair. It's less painful than waxing, and fairly quick. There was a "help wanted" sign, and offer to train.
I noted the price list. It was about what you would pay in India, just in dollars instead of rupees.
I felt like there was a bit of India in the mall.
I hand over my watch, and have a five minute wait. I start to look around, watching the mall-goers as they too are touted. He didn't seem to have much luck.
Behind me, I noticed a new kiosk, as yet, unmanned. They will offer threading, a process common in India and at least some parts of the Middle East. It's hard to succinctly describe, but, it's facial hair removal through use of thread. The thread is twisted, and captures the hair. It's less painful than waxing, and fairly quick. There was a "help wanted" sign, and offer to train.
I noted the price list. It was about what you would pay in India, just in dollars instead of rupees.
I felt like there was a bit of India in the mall.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)